Karya Ilmiah
DISERTASI (188) - Prinsip Audi Et Alteram Partem Dalam Perkara Perdata Diperadilan Umum
The Law of Judicial Power has not regulated the legal principles of Audi
et Alteram Partem, while the rules in HIR are still vague or blurred. The
dissertation research focused on three issues: The philosophical basic of Audi et
alteram partem principle; Characteristics of civil cases and their relation of
decisions based on Audi et alteram partem; and Ratio decidendi judge decision on
the application of Audi et alteram partem. The research approach is: Statutory
Approach; Conceptual Approach; Case Approach; and Comparative
Approach.This research concluded that: first, the principle of Audi et alteram
Partem means "hear both side " or “ hear the other side”, which is "equality of
balance" and "equality of opportunity" of parties in the judicial process, reflected
"justice" and the background of a decision that waives the principle of law and
“equality before the law”. The principle of Audi et alteram Partem is different
from Equality before the Law. Second, characteristic types of civil litigation
lawsuits, general and special nature and processed through contentious judicial.
The trial process ended with a decision based on Audi et Alteram Partem, with the
characteristic of a legal effort. Third, the basis for deciding the case contained in
the legal considerations (Ratio decidendi). Sources of judgment considerations
include: material aspects of the case; formal aspects; principles of law and custom
in the judiciary. In Ratio decidendi, new rules are developed and established when
the formal aspects of the case do not exist and judges are required to seek and
extract from the habits in society and apply the principles of law as the basis of
the philosophy of the decision based on Audi et Alteram Partem.
Keywords: Audi et alteram partem, civil, general judiciary
031317017312 | 188 | Ruang Disertasi | Tersedia |
Tidak tersedia versi lain